Page 88 of 94

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:34 pm
by mr mixin
Sounds like classic tarantino just from that one line.

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:56 pm
by 117
ed - it's worth watching the rest - that's more or less the end of part one of the film, the second part is considerably different and yet entirely the same at the same time :p

mixy - tis indeed a classic Tarantino film :)

Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:14 pm
by fac51
Yeah problem was that didn't happen until after 45 minutes or so and not much happened at all up to that point. Will have to watch the rest then if it gets better.

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:48 pm
by 117
Letters From Iwo Jima - very enjoyable indeed :) 8/10

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:55 pm
by fac51
The Lookout - Don;t know why it scored so highly on IMDB, it was entertaining but I would only give it 5.5/10 max.

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:15 pm
by 117
Planet Terror - some very very funny moments, even Tarantino delivers a good line in it 8/10

both Grindhouse DVDs on Region 1 me right up :stu

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:25 pm
by fac51
Will watch that if I ever fish watching Grindhouse :para:

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:23 pm
by 117
you mean Death Proof....

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 6:42 am
by fac51
yeah probably :P

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:32 am
by 117
Hot Fuzz - a more over-rated 'comedy' I have not seen, yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn 1/5

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:29 am
by 117
28 Weeks Later - substantially gory, but limited in the way of story, I seem to remember the first film being considerably better - 6/10

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:39 am
by fac51
both good films :para:

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:56 pm
by Andy
Stardust :para:

And I really liked it :para: :para: :para:

*ninja exit*

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:18 pm
by fac51
Well it's got Clare Danes in it so it can;t be that bad.

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:56 pm
by 117
I read a really bad review of Stardust, however I've seen it get real good ratings elsewhere, so I'm tempted
fac51 wrote:Well it's got Clare Danes in it so it can;t be that bad
based on what? :para: