Movies Good and bad!!!! Review or read here about them!

Welcome to the real world... A forum dedicated to movie discussions.

Moderators: fac51, 117, arfur, vinnieza

User avatar
Adamizer
Film Guru
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 9:10 pm
Location: Gothenburg Sweden

Post by Adamizer »

guru wrote:well tbh adam the site is for games and gadgets etc.. just not sure if i should have reviews on the main site as well as the forum?!? that is in no way saying not to do em coz we love reading em on the forum :mrgreen:
Ill say, whats that got anything to do with have or not have.
Expansion to all media is good and will keep a broader public interested, would it not?
User avatar
fac51
Gaming Guru
Posts: 14526
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 11:00 am
Location: Rapture
Contact:

Post by fac51 »

yeah maybe but i think that was the problem with my last forum - too broad and not targeting one particular niche
Image
User avatar
fac51
Gaming Guru
Posts: 14526
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 11:00 am
Location: Rapture
Contact:

Post by fac51 »

am i offending u adam :(
Image
User avatar
Adamizer
Film Guru
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 9:10 pm
Location: Gothenburg Sweden

Post by Adamizer »

I mean it wouldnt hurt to have it, Its not gonna, so to speak, take away intrest from the other spheres, ie, games and gadgets and so on, not that Im particulary fond of writing but since I see all the movies, I do it anyway. And others should to. U see, a lot of games origin from movies... u see my point is. Now u have it as a natural spinoff from ur topics. So just keep it in the forumpages there its making a plentitude of people aware of what movies they can see.

But as usuall I leave it to u to decide, but now u have had my opinion.
Last edited by Adamizer on Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
fac51
Gaming Guru
Posts: 14526
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 11:00 am
Location: Rapture
Contact:

Post by fac51 »

Adamizer wrote: So just keep it in the forumpages there its making a plentitude of people aware of what movies they can see.
yeah you are probably right.. i'll leave the movie reviews just in the forum for now as you say but link em from the games reviews where spin offs are concerned :)
Image
User avatar
Adamizer
Film Guru
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 9:10 pm
Location: Gothenburg Sweden

Post by Adamizer »

Was that what I was saying? I thougth I meant in the head site. well ther u go when its not ur lingo. OK then. :P
User avatar
fac51
Gaming Guru
Posts: 14526
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 11:00 am
Location: Rapture
Contact:

Post by fac51 »

:lol:
Image
117
Lowly Janitor Guru
Posts: 12548
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 12:23 pm
Location: a destination a little up the road

Post by 117 »

:lol:
Image
Image
User avatar
Adamizer
Film Guru
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 9:10 pm
Location: Gothenburg Sweden

Post by Adamizer »

Just Married
Image

:arse: :arse:
Director - Shawn Levy

Actors - Ashton Kutcher, Brittany Murphy, Christian Kane, Taran Killam, Monet Mazur

Just Married isn't quite that bad, but it's not very good either.

Just Married stars Ashton Kutcher and Brittany Murphy as a pair of twenty-somethings who fall in love and get married. He's a sports nut who works part time at a radio station doing midnight traffic reports. She is a waspy princess from Bel Air whose father (David Rasche, king of the asshole wasps) owns a pair of sports teams. Opposites attract as they say and soon after meeting they are married and off for a European honeymoon.

The film begins with the pair returning from Europe ready to kill one another. In flashback, Tom (Kutcher) explains how they met when he popped her in the face with a football on a beach. They then bonded over a game of pool and sex on their first date. Things proceed quickly as, still in flashback, we find that they moved in together after only a month of dating.

Tom then regales the mistakes each made that would come back to haunt them. First, we find that Tom accidentally killed Sarah's (Murphy) dog, then lied about it. We then learn on their wedding day that Sarah had slept with an ex-boyfriend whom she had told Tom was just a platonic friend. Of course, the ex-boyfriend is a rich guy named Peter (Christian Kane) whom Sarah's family adores.

From there, the flashback jumps ahead to the Honeymoon where things go bad from the start. After arriving in France and getting the wrong rental car, they arrive at their luxury hotel. Once there, Tom manages to nearly destroy the place with a sextoy.

Well gee, it's a romantic comedy. Do you think Tom and Sarah will overcome their problems and help love prevail? I will leave the mystery.

This movie brings nothing new to this tired genre comedy. The only thing the film has going for it is the likabilty of the actors involved. Without them, Just Married would easily be one of the worst films I have seen. Brittany Murphy's huge brown eyes and bubbly energetic personality make her so amazingly likable you forgive the ridiculousness of the plot she is trapped in.

As for Kutcher, he has his moments, especially towards the end when he lets his manic comic energy overcome him. His rage at trying to get through the fence surrounding Sarah's parent's mansion is the only really funny moment of the film.
User avatar
Adamizer
Film Guru
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 9:10 pm
Location: Gothenburg Sweden

BASIC

Post by Adamizer »

BASIC
Image

:arse: :arse: :arse:

The Director
John McTiernan

Cast:
John Travolta, Connie Nielsen, Samuel L. Jackson,
Brian Van Holt, Timothy Daly, Giovanni Ribisi,
Taye Diggs, Roselyn Sanchez, Cristian de la Fuente,
Harry Connick Jr., Nick Loren, Chris Byrne, Dash Mihok




With as many plot twists as "Basic" had, it was hard for me to develop an opinion of this movie until the very end. After the final plot twist, however, I was in fact pleased with the resolution, one that I had not seen coming.

John Travolta played Tom Hardy, an ex-army Ranger who was called in to interrogate a soldier about a training mission that had resulted in the apparent deaths of several other soldiers, including their stern commander, Sgt. Nathan West (Samuel L. Jackson). Lt. Julia Osborne (Connie Nielson) aided Tom Hardy in the interrogation as they both tried to make sense of the events of the mission. They questioned two soldiers, one played by Brian Van Holt and the other by Giovanni Ribisi, who gave a unique performance in his role as the injured soldier Kendall.

To go further into the story would be to give away the plot twists that kept the film anything but basic. Granted, there were a lot of twists, but it was the last one that left the most impression. It helped me to overlook the slight alienation caused by the overabundance of redirection. The twists had been happening so close together that the movie barely gave the audience enough time to realize everything that had unfolded.

John Travolta kept his character of Tom Hardy fresh through the use of humor and a vibrant personality. It was enjoyable to watch his brief onscreen reunion with Samuel L. Jackson, who had previously worked with him in Quentin Tarantino's "Pulp Fiction" (1994). With "Basic," Travolta may have risen a little bit from his slump, though we'll have to wait and see what he does next.

"Basic" was an almost intelligent military thriller with a few too many twists and turns, but in the end, it twisted and turned in all the right directions.
User avatar
fac51
Gaming Guru
Posts: 14526
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 11:00 am
Location: Rapture
Contact:

Post by fac51 »

watched my little eye - verdict = crap and ghost ship - verdict = not very good and too gory at the start! ;) just my 10 cents worth :D
Image
117
Lowly Janitor Guru
Posts: 12548
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 12:23 pm
Location: a destination a little up the road

Post by 117 »

completely agree about my little eye, it was complete arse, but how can a film be too gory?
Image
Image
User avatar
fac51
Gaming Guru
Posts: 14526
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 11:00 am
Location: Rapture
Contact:

Post by fac51 »

this happens as u get older m8.. films seem to get gorier! :o
Image
User avatar
Vlammetje
Sexy Guru
Posts: 6569
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 12:52 pm
Location: Den Haag
Contact:

Post by Vlammetje »

I'm confused. I thought 'gory' meant bloody or blooded??
www.vlammetje.com
User avatar
fac51
Gaming Guru
Posts: 14526
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 11:00 am
Location: Rapture
Contact:

Post by fac51 »

it does
Image
Post Reply